| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: popcount |
| Date: | 2021-01-11 16:13:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20210111161354.GA8721@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-12-30 17:41, David Fetter wrote:
> > > The input may have more than 2 billion bits set to 1. The biggest possible
> > > result should be 8 billion for bytea (1 GB with all bits set to 1).
> > > So shouldn't this function return an int8?
> > It does now, and thanks for looking at this.
>
> The documentation still reflects the previous int4 return type (in two
> different spellings, too).
Thanks for looking this over!
Please find attached the next version with corrected documentation.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-popcount.patch | text/x-diff | 6.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-01-11 16:20:53 | Re: Add Nullif case for eval_const_expressions_mutator |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-01-11 15:21:36 | Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types |