Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge

From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
Date: 2020-07-25 21:43:28
Message-ID: 20200725234328.6130c23e@firost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:16:55 +0530
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> > <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not an english-native writer, but I would rephrase this:
> > >
> > > We can do a similar thing for Gather Merge as well but it seems the
> > > better to account for stats during nodes shutdown after completing the
> > > execution.
> >
> > Fair enough. I will adopt your suggestion before commit. I'll wait
> > for a day or so to see if anyone has more comments.
> >
>
> Pushed.

Thank you!

Regards,

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tutiluren 2020-07-26 01:44:47 Re: pg_dump seems to be broken in regards to the "--exclude-table-data" option on Windows.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-07-25 14:42:59 Re: BUG #16554: Consistent sequence gaps occuring next day