Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
Date: 2020-07-25 07:46:55
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+48fdJqERACBMUbC5eONrMcDLOii-P_-6J52X1eO-KgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm not an english-native writer, but I would rephrase this:
> >
> > We can do a similar thing for Gather Merge as well but it seems the better
> > to account for stats during nodes shutdown after completing the execution.
> >
>
> Fair enough. I will adopt your suggestion before commit. I'll wait
> for a day or so to see if anyone has more comments.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2020-07-25 08:52:38 BUG #16554: Consistent sequence gaps occuring next day
Previous Message Cy 2020-07-25 03:23:34 subquery column error causes data destroying equality