Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c
Date: 2020-05-29 05:38:53
Message-ID: 20200529053853.GE44192@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 05:15:17PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The comment in be-secure-openssl.c didn't get the memo that the hardcoded DH
> parameters moved in 573bd08b99e277026e87bb55ae69c489fab321b8. The attached
> updates the wording, keeping it generic enough that we wont need to update it
> should the parameters move again.

Indeed, looks good to me. I'll go fix, ust let's wait and see first
if others have any comments.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-05-29 05:49:54 Re: Internal key management system
Previous Message David Rowley 2020-05-29 05:16:32 Speeding up parts of the planner using a binary search tree structure for nodes