Re: Collation versioning

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Collation versioning
Date: 2020-03-17 16:31:47
Message-ID: 20200317163147.GA1337480@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Peter Eisentraut 2020-03-17 <fd8d4475-85ad-506f-2dda-f4d6e66785bc(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> Did we discuss the regcollation type? In the current patch set, it's only
> used in two places in a new regression test, where it can easily be replaced
> by a join. Do we need it?
>
> I realize we've been adding new reg* types lately; I'm not sure what the
> current idea is on that.

Not sure if that's the case there, but reg* typecasts are very handy
when used interactively in ad-hoc queries.

Christoph

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2020-03-17 16:41:43 Re: BEFORE ROW triggers for partitioned tables
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-03-17 16:24:09 Re: Collation versioning