Re: Collation versioning

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Collation versioning
Date: 2020-03-17 16:24:09
Message-ID: fd8d4475-85ad-506f-2dda-f4d6e66785bc@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Did we discuss the regcollation type? In the current patch set, it's
only used in two places in a new regression test, where it can easily be
replaced by a join. Do we need it?

I realize we've been adding new reg* types lately; I'm not sure what the
current idea is on that.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2020-03-17 16:31:47 Re: Collation versioning
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-03-17 16:20:44 Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index