From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Collation versioning |
Date: | 2020-03-17 16:24:09 |
Message-ID: | fd8d4475-85ad-506f-2dda-f4d6e66785bc@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Did we discuss the regcollation type? In the current patch set, it's
only used in two places in a new regression test, where it can easily be
replaced by a join. Do we need it?
I realize we've been adding new reg* types lately; I'm not sure what the
current idea is on that.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2020-03-17 16:31:47 | Re: Collation versioning |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-03-17 16:20:44 | Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index |