Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Date: 2020-03-03 01:14:06
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:28:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This test should check after indisclustered. Except that, the patch
> is fine so I'll apply it if there are no objections.

I got a second look at this one, and applied it down to 12 after some
small modifications in the new test and in the comments.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-03-03 01:29:11 Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-03-03 00:27:20 Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side