Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Date: 2020-03-02 03:28:18
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:52:58AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Rebased Amit's patch and included my own 0002 to fix the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
> issue.

I have looked at 0002 as that concerns me.

> +SELECT indexrelid::regclass FROM pg_index WHERE indrelid='concur_clustered'::regclass;
> + indexrelid
> +------------------------
> + concur_clustered_i_idx
> +(1 row)

This test should check after indisclustered. Except that, the patch
is fine so I'll apply it if there are no objections.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2020-03-02 03:30:51 Re: logical replication empty transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-02 02:06:00 Re: Ought to use heap_multi_insert() for pg_attribute/depend insertions?