Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Date: 2020-03-03 01:31:32
Message-ID: 20200303013132.GA684@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:28:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > +SELECT indexrelid::regclass FROM pg_index WHERE indrelid='concur_clustered'::regclass;
>
> This test should check after indisclustered. Except that, the patch
> is fine so I'll apply it if there are no objections.

Oops - I realized that, but didn't send a new patch before you noticed - thanks
for handling it.

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-03-03 01:36:25 Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-03 01:31:07 Re: Symbolic names for the values of typalign and typstorage