Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Taylor Vesely <tvesely(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Adam Lee <ali(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Melanie Plageman <mplageman(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Date: 2020-02-24 23:29:28
Message-ID: 20200224232928.45bcjmdxgnobijgi@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-02-22 11:02:16 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-02-22 at 10:00 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Both patches, or just 0013? Seems the earlier one might make the
> > addition of the opcodes you add less verbose?
>
> Just 0013, thank you. 0008 looks like it will simplify things.

Pushed 0008.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2020-02-25 00:44:04 Re: [Patch] Make pg_checksums skip foreign tablespace directories
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-02-24 23:29:03 Re: Ought to use heap_multi_insert() for pg_attribute/depend insertions?