Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Taylor Vesely <tvesely(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Adam Lee <ali(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Melanie Plageman <mplageman(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Date: 2020-02-22 19:02:16
Message-ID: 5c371df7cee903e8cd4c685f90c6c72086d3a2dc.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2020-02-22 at 10:00 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Both patches, or just 0013? Seems the earlier one might make the
> addition of the opcodes you add less verbose?

Just 0013, thank you. 0008 looks like it will simplify things.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2020-02-22 19:59:59 Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-02-22 18:00:20 Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation