Re: segmentation fault when cassert enabled

From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: segmentation fault when cassert enabled
Date: 2019-12-16 15:46:39
Message-ID: 20191216164639.4b29efd4@firost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:27:43 +0100
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 2019-12-16 11:11, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I agree that this is a timing issue. I also don't see a way to write
> > a reproducible test for this. However, I could reproduce it via
> > debugger consistently by following the below steps. I have updated a
> > few comments and commit messages in the attached patch.
> >
> > Peter E., Petr J or anyone else, do you have comments or objections on
> > this patch? If none, then I am planning to commit (and backpatch)
> > this patch in a few days time.
>
> The patch seems fine to me. Writing a test seems hard. Let's skip it.
>
> The commit message has a duplicate "building"/"built" in the first sentence.

I think the sentence is quite long. I had to re-read it to get it.

What about:

This patch allows building the local relmap cache for a subscribed relation
after processing pending invalidation messages and potential relcache
updates.

Regards,

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Zubiri 2019-12-16 15:54:36 Re: Improvement to psql's connection defaults
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2019-12-16 15:40:00 Re: segmentation fault when cassert enabled