Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Anton Dignös <anton(dot)dignoes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2019-12-01 03:45:56
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:58:31AM +0200, Peter Moser wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your effort. We are now trying to put again more work
> and time in this patch.
> We are grateful for any feedback.

The latest patch applies, but does not build because of an OID
conflict. For development purposes, please make sure to use an OID in
the range 8000~9000 which are reserved for development per the
recently-added new project policy. For now I have moved the patch to
next CF, waiting on author.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 03:53:17 Re: Do we have a CF manager for November?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 03:43:11 Re: NOT IN subquery optimization