Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Anton Dignös <anton(dot)dignoes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2019-08-08 07:58:31
Message-ID: b4f2ee37-407b-287b-dbe0-6e4f0fc4c7d8@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ibrar, Thomas and Robert,

On 8/2/19 11:00 PM, Ibrar Ahmed wrote:
> I have rebased the patch and currently reviewing the patch 
> on master (1e2fddfa33d3c7cc93ca3ee0f32852699bd3e012).

Thanks a lot for your effort. We are now trying to put again more work
and time in this patch.
We are grateful for any feedback.

Thanks,
Peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-08-08 08:08:51 Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-08-08 07:56:40 Re: Some memory not freed at the exit of RelationBuildPartitionDesc()