| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Do we have a CF manager for November? |
| Date: | 2019-12-01 03:53:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20191201035317.GL2355@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:02:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So, we are close to the end of this commit fest, and I have done a
> first pass on something like one third of the entries, mainly updating
> incorrect patch status, bumping them into next CF or closing stale
> items waiting on author.
I have worked more on the CF. And here are the final results:
Committed: 36.
Moved to next CF: 146.
Withdrawn: 4.
Rejected: 6.
Returned with Feedback: 29.
Total: 221.
The results are very comparable with the last CF, where 39 were marked
as committed and 28 as returned with feedback. I know that we are
still a couple of hours before officially being in December AoE
(exactly 9), so I am a bit ahead. My apologies about that.
I have been able to go through each patch, and pinged each author
where needed. By the way, the cfbot has been extremely helpful in
this exercise:
http://commitfest.cputube.org/
Thanks,
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-12-01 04:02:49 | Re: Do we have a CF manager for November? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-12-01 03:45:56 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types |