Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)free(dot)fr>, Evgeny Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Date: 2019-08-01 18:36:32
Message-ID: 20190801183632.7byx3knosxas4ih3@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-08-01 14:20:46 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> However, I think that the fact that this patch adds 15 new calls to
> pg_atomic_write_u64(&MyProc->queryId, ...) is probably not a good
> sign. It seems like we ought to be able to centralize it better than
> that.

+1

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-08-01 18:43:33 Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-08-01 18:36:20 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?