On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:36 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2019-08-01 14:20:46 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > However, I think that the fact that this patch adds 15 new calls to
> > pg_atomic_write_u64(&MyProc->queryId, ...) is probably not a good
> > sign. It seems like we ought to be able to centralize it better than
> > that.
>
> +1
Unfortunately I didn't find a better way to do that. Since you can
have nested execution, I don't see how to avoid adding extra code in
every parts of query execution.