Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date: 2019-08-01 18:43:33
Message-ID: 20190801184333.GA21369@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hmm, I'm trying this out now and I don't see the index_rebuild_count
ever go up. I think it's because the indexes are built using parallel
index build ... or maybe it was the table AM changes that moved things
around, not sure. There's a period at the end when the CLUSTER command
keeps working, but it's gone from pg_stat_progress_cluster.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2019-08-01 18:54:56 Re: Batch insert in CTAS/MatView code
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-08-01 18:36:32 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?