| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD |
| Date: | 2019-04-25 19:54:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20190425195406.ykcfgv3barkdbpfp@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-04-25 15:05:47 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Mar-10, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
>
> > Then I guess we need to add the attached patch on top of a pg_dump support for
> > table am. It contains changes to use NULL as a default value for owner / defn /
> > dropStmt (exactly what we've changed back in 19455c9f56), and doesn't crash,
> > since K_VERS is different.
>
> I think this is an open item; we were supposed to do it right after
> 3b925e905de3, but failed to notice.
>
> Would anybody be too upset if I push this patch now? CC'ed RMT.
I think that'd make sense. The rest of the RMT probably isn't awake
however, so I think it'd be good to give them 24h to object.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-25 20:02:03 | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-04-25 19:51:30 | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 |