Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD
Date: 2019-04-26 02:55:17
Message-ID: 20190426025517.GA1904@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:54:06PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think that'd make sense. The rest of the RMT probably isn't awake
> however, so I think it'd be good to give them 24h to object.

It would be nice to clean all that now, so +1 from me to apply the
patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-26 03:05:37 Re: "Routine Reindexing" docs should be updated to reference REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-04-26 02:29:41 Re: Reducing the runtime of the core regression tests