Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date: 2019-02-22 23:29:15
Message-ID: 20190222232915.GA8725@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:45:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1 ... maybe "(dropped)", because we tend to use parens for this sort
> of thing, I think.

+1. Using "dropped" sounds good to me in this context. Perhaps we
could have something more fancy like what's used for dropped columns?
It would be nice to get a reference to a schema, like say "dropped
temporary schema".
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-22 23:44:43 Re: Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2019-02-22 23:21:21 Re: Journal based VACUUM FULL