Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Matsumura, Ryo" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Michael Meskes' <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG
Date: 2019-02-02 01:30:29
Message-ID: 20190202013029.GJ11299@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 10:29:11AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I have no idea where the footnote comes from, but I agree that it doesn't seem
> to make sense. The datatype varchar in the C code is handled by the
> preprocessor and replaced by a struct definition anyway.
>
> Feel free to remove.

Moved to next CF as the discussion moves on.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-02 01:32:36 Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-02 01:28:29 Re: tab-completion debug print