| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: tab-completion debug print |
| Date: | 2019-02-02 01:28:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20190202012829.GI11299@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:07:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:53:49AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > My impression is that this patch ought to marked as rejected?
>
> I may be missing something, but I have the same impression.
Re-reading the thread I think that's too severe. Tom has mentioned
something interesting here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f6698.1543206111@sss.pgh.pa.us
So I am marking that stuff as returned with feedback.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-02 01:30:29 | Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-02 01:24:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" test pending solution of its timing is (fwd) |