Re: speeding up planning with partitions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-02-01 09:51:58
Message-ID: 201902010951.c5hz5an3eo37@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jan-31, David Rowley wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 22:32, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > Attached updated patches.
>
> I think we could make the 0001 patch a bit smaller if we were to apply
> the attached first.
>
> Details in the commit message.
>
> What do you think?

Amit didn't say what he thinks, but I think it looks good and the
rationale for it makes sense, so I pushed it. I only amended some
comments a little bit.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-01 09:58:58 Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2019-02-01 09:29:11 Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG