Re: speeding up planning with partitions

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-02-01 14:09:41
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8sqLqLF64CYhnVXnRU_Mm0sLpm7pyNs8ZLoQ1X2XhAOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 22:52, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Jan-31, David Rowley wrote:
> >
> > I think we could make the 0001 patch a bit smaller if we were to apply
> > the attached first.
> >
> > Details in the commit message.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Amit didn't say what he thinks, but I think it looks good and the
> rationale for it makes sense, so I pushed it. I only amended some
> comments a little bit.

Thanks.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-02-01 14:11:35 Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-02-01 14:07:37 Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and UPDATE