Re: Clean up some elog messages and comments for do_pg_stop_backup and do_pg_start_backup

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clean up some elog messages and comments for do_pg_stop_backup and do_pg_start_backup
Date: 2018-12-31 08:07:47
Message-ID: 20181231080747.GA2860@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 02:50:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> A personal note on the matter: I tend to prefer using the passive form
> in such log messages because they are impersonal, and not use the
> direct form because it becomes more personally addressed to the user.
> I may be living abroad for too long though ;)

So, are there any objections regarding the previously-sent patch or
other suggestions? All comments from Peter and Alvaro have been
included.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-12-31 08:57:04 Re: Speeding up creating UPDATE/DELETE generic plan for partitioned table into a lot
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-12-31 06:03:05 Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards