| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_partition_tree crashes for a non-defined relation |
| Date: | 2018-12-10 13:52:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20181210135237.GA1473@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 08:21:43AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Michael Paquier (michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz) wrote:
>> This still looks adapted to me. Or would you reword it because "allow"
>> rather implies that an ERROR is returned? Would you prefer changing it
>> something like that perhaps:
>> "Return NULL for relation types that do not appear in partition trees."
>
> Yes.
OK. Sure, let's do as you suggest then. I'll wait a couple of days
before committing the patch so as if someone has extra comments they
have the time to post. So please feel free to comment!
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-12-10 13:56:47 | Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-12-10 13:21:43 | Re: pg_partition_tree crashes for a non-defined relation |