Re: Online verification of checksums

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online verification of checksums
Date: 2018-12-03 00:48:43
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 12:47:13PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Just for the information, looks like part of this patch (or at least some
> similar code), related to the tests in, was committed recently
> in 5c99513975, so there are minor conflicts with the master.

What what I can see in v7 of the patch as posted in [1], all the changes
to could just be removed because there are already


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ideriha, Takeshi 2018-12-03 01:39:54 RE: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-03 00:41:43 Re: Commitfest 2018-11