Re: Online verification of checksums

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online verification of checksums
Date: 2018-12-01 11:47:13
Message-ID: CA+q6zcXaw+firw_z-XuOeTfz0OQKoRN3t5LsCV13YP-0-DEoTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:38 PM Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 06:22:52PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > >I am not convinced we need to differentiate further between online and
> > >offline operation, can you explain in more detail which other
> > >differences are ok in online mode and why?
> >
> > For instance the "file/directory was removed" do not look okay at all when
> > offline, even if unlikely. Moreover, the checks hides the error message and
> > is fully silent in this case, while it was not beforehand on the same error
> > when offline.
>
> OK, I kinda see the point here and added that.

Hi,

Just for the information, looks like part of this patch (or at least some
similar code), related to the tests in 002_actions.pl, was committed recently
in 5c99513975, so there are minor conflicts with the master.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-12-01 12:11:01 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-12-01 11:23:01 Re: cursors with prepared statements