| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT |
| Date: | 2018-11-06 17:18:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20181106171838.umtxnrvccasyb3ih@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Nov-06, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>
> > Patch does not seem to apply anymore, could you rebase?
> >
> The attached patch is a rebased version and work by ‘inserts=100’ as
> Stephen suggest
I thought the suggestion was that the number could be any positive
integer, not hardcoded 100. It shouldn't take much more code to handle
it that way, which makes more sense to me.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Emre Hasegeli | 2018-11-06 17:19:28 | Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Daniel Verite | 2018-11-06 17:18:37 | Re: Doc patch on psql output formats |