Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Surafel Temsgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Date: 2018-11-06 17:57:53
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB-GSM6D3pamoctay24KtB+EyQtRDZTHw+zQTUy5uJwPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

út 6. 11. 2018 v 18:18 odesílatel Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
napsal:

> On 2018-Nov-06, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Patch does not seem to apply anymore, could you rebase?
> > >
> > The attached patch is a rebased version and work by ‘inserts=100’ as
> > Stephen suggest
>
> I thought the suggestion was that the number could be any positive
> integer, not hardcoded 100. It shouldn't take much more code to handle
> it that way, which makes more sense to me.
>
>
+1

100 looks really strange

Pavel

--
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-11-06 18:10:19 Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message chenhj 2018-11-06 17:57:50 Re:Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLock buffer_content lock