From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Surafel Temsgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT |
Date: | 2018-11-06 17:57:53 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRB-GSM6D3pamoctay24KtB+EyQtRDZTHw+zQTUy5uJwPQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
út 6. 11. 2018 v 18:18 odesílatel Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
napsal:
> On 2018-Nov-06, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Patch does not seem to apply anymore, could you rebase?
> > >
> > The attached patch is a rebased version and work by ‘inserts=100’ as
> > Stephen suggest
>
> I thought the suggestion was that the number could be any positive
> integer, not hardcoded 100. It shouldn't take much more code to handle
> it that way, which makes more sense to me.
>
>
+1
100 looks really strange
Pavel
--
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-11-06 18:10:19 | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
Previous Message | chenhj | 2018-11-06 17:57:50 | Re:Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLock buffer_content lock |