Re: CF app feature request

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CF app feature request
Date: 2018-11-02 00:40:54
Message-ID: 20181102004054.GR1727@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:56:24PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 11/01/2018 05:50 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Are you thinking basically another status that's "Withdrawn", but
>> keeping it, or actually removing the records completely?
>
> I don't know enough about the app internals to comment. But it probably
> shouldn't appear in the stats, or else should have its own category in the
> stats.

Or that's closer to "Rejected by the author himself"? "Withdrawn"
sounds like a good term for that, we surely don't want to simply remove
the thing entirely either. What's actually the issue with not tracking
such things in the stats?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-11-02 00:42:34 Re: INSTALL file
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-11-02 00:38:02 Re: INSTALL file