Re: CF app feature request

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CF app feature request
Date: 2018-11-02 07:17:51
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1811020813390.12518@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> I don't know enough about the app internals to comment. But it probably
>> shouldn't appear in the stats, or else should have its own category in the
>> stats.
> Or that's closer to "Rejected by the author himself"? "Withdrawn"
> sounds like a good term for that, we surely don't want to simply remove
> the thing entirely either. What's actually the issue with not tracking
> such things in the stats?

Because the same patch submission is already counted? It is a rare
occurence, so just a "Withdrawn" state could be enough, and slightly false
CF stats are no big deal.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-11-02 07:30:24 Re: Small run-time pruning doc fix
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2018-11-02 07:16:53 Re: Doubts about pushing LIMIT to MergeAppendPath