|From:||Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>|
|To:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>|
|Cc:||Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: CF app feature request|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
>> I don't know enough about the app internals to comment. But it probably
>> shouldn't appear in the stats, or else should have its own category in the
> Or that's closer to "Rejected by the author himself"? "Withdrawn"
> sounds like a good term for that, we surely don't want to simply remove
> the thing entirely either. What's actually the issue with not tracking
> such things in the stats?
Because the same patch submission is already counted? It is a rare
occurence, so just a "Withdrawn" state could be enough, and slightly false
CF stats are no big deal.
|Next Message||Peter Eisentraut||2018-11-02 07:30:24||Re: Small run-time pruning doc fix|
|Previous Message||Antonin Houska||2018-11-02 07:16:53||Re: Doubts about pushing LIMIT to MergeAppendPath|