| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CF app feature request |
| Date: | 2018-11-02 07:17:51 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.21.1811020813390.12518@lancre |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> I don't know enough about the app internals to comment. But it probably
>> shouldn't appear in the stats, or else should have its own category in the
>> stats.
>
> Or that's closer to "Rejected by the author himself"? "Withdrawn"
> sounds like a good term for that, we surely don't want to simply remove
> the thing entirely either. What's actually the issue with not tracking
> such things in the stats?
Because the same patch submission is already counted? It is a rare
occurence, so just a "Withdrawn" state could be enough, and slightly false
CF stats are no big deal.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-11-02 07:30:24 | Re: Small run-time pruning doc fix |
| Previous Message | Antonin Houska | 2018-11-02 07:16:53 | Re: Doubts about pushing LIMIT to MergeAppendPath |