Re: CF app feature request

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CF app feature request
Date: 2018-11-01 21:56:24
Message-ID: 207130fd-24d8-5eb2-0d70-abe2fe9717a9@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/01/2018 05:50 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:44 PM Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> <mailto:andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> Yesterday Fabien and I submitted the same item to the Commitfest
> (1859
> and 1860). Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any way for one of
> these to be withdrawn. "Rejected" and "Returned with Feedback" seem
> wrong. Ideally, there would be a way for someone who submits an
> item in
> error to withdraw it, at which point it should be as if it had never
> been submitted.
>
> Meanwhile, what's the advice about how to deal with these?
>
>
> Are you thinking basically another status that's "Withdrawn", but
> keeping it, or actually removing the records completely?
>
>

I don't know enough about the app internals to comment. But it probably
shouldn't appear in the stats, or else should have its own category in
the stats.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-11-01 22:05:03 Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2018-11-01 21:52:19 Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks