| From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth |
| Date: | 2018-09-19 04:03:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20180919.130344.143733188.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for finding and fixing this.
At Sat, 15 Sep 2018 18:21:52 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in <15555(dot)1537050112(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > Usually, the first srandom() call happens early in PostmasterMain(). I plan
> > to add one to InitStandaloneProcess(), which substitutes for several tasks
> > otherwise done in PostmasterMain(). That seems like a good thing even if DSM
> > weren't in the picture. Also, initdb needs an srandom() somewhere;
> > choose_dsm_implementation() itself seems fine. Attached.
>
> +1, but some comments would be good.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
+1, too.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-09-19 04:37:49 | Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots |
| Previous Message | The Coding Planet | 2018-09-19 03:49:38 | Regarding Mentoring for GCI-18 |