From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add wait event for fsync of WAL segments |
Date: | 2018-07-02 16:23:35 |
Message-ID: | 20180702162335.cfa2cthcxanbzjnv@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Jul-02, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Add wait event for fsync of WAL segments
>
> This has been visibly a forgotten spot in the first implementation of
> wait events for I/O added by 249cf07, and what has been missing is a
> fsync call for WAL segments which is a wrapper reacting on the value of
> GUC wal_sync_method.
I wonder if we should backpatch this one all the way to pg10. I don't
see no reason not to.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-07-02 18:07:37 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-07-02 16:21:50 | Re: Tips on committing |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-07-02 16:28:04 | Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Retail IndexTuple deletion |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-07-02 16:21:50 | Re: Tips on committing |