Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Date: 2018-03-22 01:42:20
Message-ID: 20180322014220.GE2490@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:48:02AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I've pushed the configure tests. Let's see what they say.

At least the buildfarm is green. Browsing the buildfarm logs manually
is kind of annoying for any normal human being. I guess that you have
access to the database holding all this data, which could make that
easier to look. What are those telling about SIZEOF_BOOL in
pg_config.h?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2018-03-22 01:42:35 Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-22 01:39:57 Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two