| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |
| Date: | 2018-03-22 01:42:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YE2H+BULrLr+8OJKxKVS=d7PuUqHPWRESs_ncaN=Was3w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 March 2018 at 09:39, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:51:04AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> > On 3/6/18 4:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > It seems the consensus is that we'll need a build farm update before we
> > can move forward with the patch and that we don't need to wait long for
> > people to upgrade.
> >
> > Andrew, do you have a date for the next release?
>
> Even if a lighter version of this patch stripped from multi-version
> support (Who uses that actually?)
I'm super excited by the idea of multi-version support in TAP, if that's
what you mean.
Why? Because I use TAP heavily in extensions. Especially replication
extensions. Which like to talk across multiple versions. I currently need
external test frameworks and some hideous hacks to do this.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-22 01:49:57 | Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-22 01:42:20 | Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use |