Re: autovacuum: change priority of the vacuumed tables

From: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum: change priority of the vacuumed tables
Date: 2018-03-02 09:07:51
Message-ID: 20180302120751.5b406f26@wp.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 23:39:34 -0800
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2018-02-19 17:00:34 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > I have a hard time understanding how adding yet another autovacuum
> > table-level knob makes the DBA's life any easier. Especially when
> > the behavior is so unreliable and does not really guarantee when the
> > high-priority table will be cleaned up ...
>
> Based on the criticism voiced and a quick skim of the proposal, this
> CF entry appears to still be in its design phase. In my opinion this
> thus isn't v11 material, and should be marked as 'returned with
> feedback'?

Hi, I agree, this patch definitely needs more thinking.

--
---
Ildus Kurbangaliev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ildus Kurbangaliev 2018-03-02 09:22:15 Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #3)
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2018-03-02 09:03:16 Re: 2018-03 CFM