Re: autovacuum: change priority of the vacuumed tables

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum: change priority of the vacuumed tables
Date: 2018-03-02 07:39:34
Message-ID: 20180302073934.nrfdvravidoigsxy@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-02-19 17:00:34 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I have a hard time understanding how adding yet another autovacuum
> table-level knob makes the DBA's life any easier. Especially when the
> behavior is so unreliable and does not really guarantee when the
> high-priority table will be cleaned up ...

Based on the criticism voiced and a quick skim of the proposal, this CF
entry appears to still be in its design phase. In my opinion this thus
isn't v11 material, and should be marked as 'returned with feedback'?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-02 07:42:02 Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2018-03-02 07:31:34 Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL