| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: autovacuum: change priority of the vacuumed tables |
| Date: | 2018-03-02 07:39:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20180302073934.nrfdvravidoigsxy@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-02-19 17:00:34 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I have a hard time understanding how adding yet another autovacuum
> table-level knob makes the DBA's life any easier. Especially when the
> behavior is so unreliable and does not really guarantee when the
> high-priority table will be cleaned up ...
Based on the criticism voiced and a quick skim of the proposal, this CF
entry appears to still be in its design phase. In my opinion this thus
isn't v11 material, and should be marked as 'returned with feedback'?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-02 07:42:02 | Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2018-03-02 07:31:34 | Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL |