| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: autovacuum: change priority of the vacuumed tables |
| Date: | 2018-03-02 15:30:42 |
| Message-ID: | 309585c3-80d1-1498-9cdf-8767db7fc9f2@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/2/18 4:07 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 23:39:34 -0800
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018-02-19 17:00:34 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> I have a hard time understanding how adding yet another autovacuum
>>> table-level knob makes the DBA's life any easier. Especially when
>>> the behavior is so unreliable and does not really guarantee when the
>>> high-priority table will be cleaned up ...
>>
>> Based on the criticism voiced and a quick skim of the proposal, this
>> CF entry appears to still be in its design phase. In my opinion this
>> thus isn't v11 material, and should be marked as 'returned with
>> feedback'?
>
> Hi, I agree, this patch definitely needs more thinking.
Marked as Returned with Feedback.
Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2018-03-02 15:35:07 | Re: BUG #14999: pg_rewind corrupts control file global/pg_control |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2018-03-02 15:13:37 | Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #4) |