Re: rename sgml files?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, david(at)fetter(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rename sgml files?
Date: 2018-02-13 03:58:22
Message-ID: 20180213.125822.1802178642030216867.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> My vote would be to backport the build changes to v10, which should be
> simple enough, and wait for 9.6 to be EOL'd before doing the rename.

Me too. However my concern is the tool chain. Maybe we should notice
packagers to prepare it?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-13 04:00:32 Re: Disabling src/test/[ssl|ldap] when not building with SSL/LDAP support
Previous Message Andrew Kane 2018-02-13 03:57:24 Re: A space-efficient, user-friendly way to store categorical data