| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: rename sgml files? |
| Date: | 2018-02-13 03:52:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20180213035238.GB2915@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:38:36PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The most practical answer might be to wait a few years till all the live
> branches use XML, and then we can do the renaming in all branches
> trivially. Perhaps finishing the XML conversion in v10 would be cheap
> enough that it'd be worth doing that to shave one year off the wait.
My vote would be to backport the build changes to v10, which should be
simple enough, and wait for 9.6 to be EOL'd before doing the rename.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Kane | 2018-02-13 03:57:24 | Re: A space-efficient, user-friendly way to store categorical data |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-02-13 03:51:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses |