| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, david(at)fetter(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: rename sgml files? |
| Date: | 2018-02-13 04:02:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20180213040236.GD2915@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:58:22PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> My vote would be to backport the build changes to v10, which should be
>> simple enough, and wait for 9.6 to be EOL'd before doing the rename.
>
> Me too. However my concern is the tool chain. Maybe we should notice
> packagers to prepare it?
Definitely. Preparing for a new major upgrade is a lot of work
already, so doing things for minor versions is risky. Asking those
folks would be necessary first as this changes the build dependencies.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-02-13 04:41:31 | heap_lock_updated_tuple_rec can leak a buffer refcount |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-02-13 04:00:32 | Re: Disabling src/test/[ssl|ldap] when not building with SSL/LDAP support |