Re: Built-in connection pooling

From: Ivan Novick <inovick(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Built-in connection pooling
Date: 2018-01-28 23:11:25
Message-ID: CAPJXddb=rLqTk-H-Ahp+z5xBP_pEdRVaQ9AWNe9D+E9wSqXXyg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The simplest thing sounds like a GUC that will automitcally end a
connection

> > idle for X seconds.
>
> Uh, we already have idle_in_transaction_session_timeout so we would just
> need a simpler version.
>

Oh i see its in 9.6, AWESOME!

Cheers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-01-28 23:35:06 Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit
Previous Message Rady, Doug 2018-01-28 23:02:57 Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts