Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
Date: 2017-08-30 14:35:58
Message-ID: 20170830143558.sb42walb2tztlfh4@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> With 8.1 being fairly far down on the EOL list, it seems about time to update
> the docs regarding PG_MODULE_MAGIC to mention the pre-8.2 #ifdef guards as an
> exception and not the default. Not sure if a Note should be used, or just a
> paragraph, so opted for a paragraph.

Uh, why would anybody be reading the pg10 docs in order to compile
modules for 8.2? I vote to just drop the suggestion that there needs to
be an #ifdef guard altogether.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-30 14:51:56 Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2017-08-30 12:33:44 Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion