Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
Date: 2017-08-30 14:52:52
Message-ID: 5326C093-4000-47C0-8460-59451130CE34@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

> On 30 Aug 2017, at 16:35, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> With 8.1 being fairly far down on the EOL list, it seems about time to update
>> the docs regarding PG_MODULE_MAGIC to mention the pre-8.2 #ifdef guards as an
>> exception and not the default. Not sure if a Note should be used, or just a
>> paragraph, so opted for a paragraph.
>
> Uh, why would anybody be reading the pg10 docs in order to compile
> modules for 8.2? I vote to just drop the suggestion that there needs to
> be an #ifdef guard altogether.

I would not object to that, I was being a bit too careful I think.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2017-08-30 17:28:55 Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-08-30 14:51:56 Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion