| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| Date: | 2017-08-17 00:00:16 |
| Message-ID: | f5e67b91-ab88-246a-1aa3-e5ade0a3c3cc@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 8/16/17 19:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Do we allow streaming replication among different OS?
>
> No. WAL is a binary format.
>
>> I thought it is
>> required that primary and standbys are same platform (in my
>> understanding this means the same hardware architecture and OS) in
>> streaming replication.
>
> Yep, I recall the same requirement.
He meant logical replication, but the code in question here is the same
for streaming replication, or whatever it's called.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2017-08-17 00:14:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-16 23:57:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-17 00:10:53 | Re: Subscription code improvements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-16 23:57:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |