Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>
Subject: Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation
Date: 2017-06-19 18:41:05
Message-ID: 20170619184105.GR1769@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 6/16/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
> >> code under src/tools/ in our main repo. Is anyone really
> >> seriously against that?
> >
> > I think it would be better to have it separate.
>
> +1.

+1.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satyanarayana Narlapuram 2017-06-19 19:08:37 Re: Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2017-06-19 18:40:35 Re: Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend