| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> |
| Subject: | Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation |
| Date: | 2017-06-19 19:27:47 |
| Message-ID: | 6024.1497900467@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 6/16/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
>>>> code under src/tools/ in our main repo. Is anyone really
>>>> seriously against that?
>>> I think it would be better to have it separate.
>> +1.
> +1.
Given the license issues raised downthread, we have no choice in
the short term. So I have a request in to create a separate repo
on git.postgresql.org (whose chain do I need to pull to get that
approved, btw?)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-06-19 19:31:00 | Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-19 19:19:35 | Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 |